Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
17
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
Colder weather means it's time for vehicle preparation[2016/10/11]
-
Prime Directive: Is Toyota Embracing Electric Vehicles After All?[2016/11/12]
-
Comparative Analysis: The cost of new power generation in South Africa[2016/10/22]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
Plastic ban in voters' hands[2016/10/24]